Article Index


The space according to the definition, penetrates everything; then the space cannot be measured. There is no proof that space exists, or it exists, but it is meaningless because it does nothing, interacts with nothing; the space can penetrate everything. Or does space only make room for planets and stars in nothingness? Is the space a kind of container for matter? Does the space only not penetrate the nothingness? Probably the term space in ancient times was a kind of placeholder, a variable name that still had to be filled with the value. For example, when the space is constantly expanding but at the same time penetrating everything, it cannot be said that the stars also move with the space or the space with the stars. Space according to the known definition, is practically nothing, zero, does not exist for everything in the universe. Planets and stars could just as well exist into nothingness, why the detour? Correctly, we notice the necessity of physical space, our thinking cannot work with nothing. But the definition of space only allows outer space to exist in nothingness, whereupon outer space continues to remain nothing, otherwise the space has no further function or appearance, the general definition of space practically only helps to accept this one idea mentally. But let's say the universe is an empty bubble in an energy cloud. Even today the energy nebulae dissolve from the walls from which matter and further space emerge. Let us assume that every 1 km³ of space contains a grain of sand, and the grain of sand floats into the newly created space. Would the known definition of space still be valid?

Then what is the gigantic emptiness in outer space? That is now certain; the space must not be able to penetrate the matter, perhaps only the cavities of the matter and that also not infinitely deep. The huge universe must be real and tangible as everything on Earth is, otherwise our real 3D environment cannot exist in a fantasy world. The space must be a product, an element or a medium, something we know and we can at least indirectly perceive. I have noticed many things that confirm the existence of space as something, but I admit the fact that at the beginning I perceived space as something like air, not as empty or nothing at all, that influenced and motivated me to look in this direction. Also, the explanation should be as simple as the effect and it should be something fundamental, like the water on Earth. Why? Because the universe contains the most space. The oceans are not only a lot of water, they contain salt, then there are the currents and many lumps that swim in there, and then there are the small beings that can no longer be perceived at ocean size. The universe may also be an ocean but of a different kind, and the space might be the water in the universe.

What speaks against this simple explanation of gravity?

When a ball is dipped into a bathtub filled with water, the water will run over the edge of the bathtub because the ball replaces the water volume. If a planet like the earth is submerged in the medium-space, the earth also replaces space volume but the space does not move and runs somewhere over but the space replaced by the earth compresses around the earth. The space around the earth compressed in this way then "presses" onto the earth, but this is only a simplified explanation.

Space, Gravity, Light

It must first be clarified what the light is, but it is still too early for a comprehensive explanation, and yet a brief explanation is needed. The light does not exist as a separate natural phenomenon. Certain energy sets the medium-space in motion (like a kind of domino effect), the medium-space transmits the energy and only in this time the space is visible for us. The light we see in outer space is energy transfers, and as long as the energy is transferred, the empty space is visible and measurable for us humans. We don't see the light, we see the space or the optical waveguide. Hence the interlocking of: space, time and the speed of light (time: the domino stones are further apart in a stretched space, but the domino stones fall down at the same speed; therefore fewer units of time are needed, i.e. domino stones that fall down. The space grids can be presented as rows of domino stones. The light tilts exactly one row of domino stones. Matter, on the other hand, tilts more rows of domino stones at the same time. The result: the larger the volume of the matter, the slower it can move in space). These three things are only one thing: the space. And in addition to these three things there comes now one other thing: the gravitation.

It is generally believed that gravity, as an effect of matter, bends the space around the Earth and this has as a result the said time differences. My idea achieves the same result, and everyone would have come up with it if space were measurable. 

Known theory: the light follows the space grids and now flies an arc around the earth because the gravity has bent the space around the earth.

My explanation of gravity: the light follows the space grids and now flies an arc around the earth instead of ending on the planet, because the space that should be in the planet is now compressed over the earth's surface. The space grids are no longer interrupted by the Earth but shifted and crushed in and on the Earth's surface.

The universe, a physical explanation

Grey: Space grids when space can penetrate anything.
Blue: Space grids, when the volume of the earth has deformed them.

As can be seen from the sketch, the light will now have to fly a longer way around the earth instead of flying directly through the earth. But the speed of light can not be exceeded, so the time really becomes a bit slower locally. If the light now flies through point P1 or P2, the distance A to B will take the same amount of time. The explanation why, we skip now, and we observe only what happens there. The space deformation, no matter if by gravitation or by Earth volume has another consequence: Point P1 and P2 had to be on top of each other! Nowhere is this problem mentioned or explained how it is solved. Would it not be logical, and in the sense of relativity theory, that materia at point P2 is shifted to point P1?

This is perhaps what we call gravity.

Outer space detects matter

The gravitation could be a local anomaly, like the time in the above example.

On the picture this time:

Gray: Space grid if no materia is present.
Blue: Space grids are deformed by materia.

The picture's my old sketch. In the sketch the following ideas are contained: the space grids penetrate a bit in the Earth's interior, then they are compressed in and over the Earth and somewhere over atmosphere they relax almost completely again, but the space grids remain a little strained over longer distances.

The universe, a physical explanation

My explanation of gravity, which works analogously with the light and time example from earlier, is a point that the theory of relativity leaves open and certainly does not remain unsolved. I think, a force will act on the materia in P2 until the materia is in P1. That would be a simple solution like slowing down the time.

When a meteorite comes into the now compressed medium-space around the Earth, thus in P2, the meteorite is moved direction P1 because the P2 where the meteorite is now located should actually be in the interior of the Earth, thus P1. Very important, the meteorite is moved with the same speed and this independent of its volume, weight or type of materia, we can clearly see that the materia has nothing to do with gravity. Larger planets should have more gravity because more matter, but the planets attract more or less matter just as strongly. A rock weighing tons or a cork will fall just as fast on earth (in vacuum). The materia seems to have no attraction like gravity! I can't recognize exactly what moves matter into its original space point. It could be the medium-space itself or the medium-space only detects the materia and controls some universe mechanism. It would make sense if the universe had a fixed rule that says: you can't be in two places in the universe at the same time. Where the meteorite is in point P2 is the wrong place, point P1 is also wrong because the meteorite is not there at all. So the meteorite is brought where it should be in space. What moves the meteorite from P2 to P1? The same thing that slows down the time.

What is the Medium Space

And now how I see it and what speaks for it. The medium-space could be a kind of force field, like a magnetic force field, but it is not measurable by humans. When larger lumps of matter float in the medium-space, gravity is created which increases analogously with the volume.  Thereby makes only little difference what kind of matter is involved, only the volume is decisive. But different elements like gas or rock are penetrated differently deep, and then the space grids bend until they can no longer bend any more. Summarized, when the medium-space begins to bend, gravity begins to originate, whereby also matter type plays a role, at which volume the gravity originates. If volume and kind of the matter must bend the space grids further, but the space grids cannot bend anymore, it results additionally a hole in the medium-space and the hole is then in the inside of the Earth in this example. The hole could probably be the reason for lava core of the planets or stars, the pressure alone in the earth's interior does not seem to be the only one, or at least such an explanation cannot be applied everywhere. The pressure in the Earth's interior enlarges the lava core, the hole in medium-space had to be smaller than the lava core. The matter in the hole in the medium-space, i.e. in nothingness, makes the matter unstable. Why? Because nothing must be something else. Another kind of space. In the nothing, no materia or something else can exist, nothing is nothing, I don't mean that rhetorically but physically.

Keyword: stars. According to this model, gravity would no longer increase from a certain volume, only the nature of matter would still cause slight gravitational differences if the parameters are still borderline. Gravity on a large planet and on a gigantic planet would then be almost as strong, but certainly much stronger than on the small Earth.

The gravitation of stars extends over larger distances around stars and is also stronger at the surface, but it is due to the liquid materia which can hardly be penetrated by the medium-space. Read more about it in the next chapters.

Space, what is already known in science? The light follows the invisible space grids, and the space can be deformed. Recently, gravitational waves were measured that originated from an exploded supernova. There was an explosion and as a result a shock, something then transported the shock in the form of waves across space. Example: throw a stone into the water and on the surface of the water you can see the energy from the stone throw traveling in wave form across the surface of the water. I am of the opinion that the medium-space has transported the explosion shock across space. Another example: we humans communicate with satellites and with the rover on Mars. What transports the radio waves or the explosion shock when space is empty, truly the definition of nothing? Sound is only transmitted in the air, a loudspeaker in outer space does not generate sound; but communication and explosion waves, and light-specific energy can be transferred by the space. Why do comets lose dust? Why have the comets tail behind them? The rock erodes over time and becomes dust, but the dust seems to rub against something and doesn't fly any further. What does dust rub against when space is really empty, the definition of nothing? Often I have read: we humans transmit radio waves which spread in space around the Earth. When other civilizations eventually receive our messages, they will know about us. This way we could also notice other civilizations. It's really like that? Just as the comet's tail is left behind, so the radio waves also spread to the place where the waves were sent. But the earth rotates around the sun and the galaxy moves the sun for the first time around its own axis and the galaxy itself also flies somewhere through the universe, the galaxy does not just rotate on the spot. The radio waves do not fly with the Earth and the galaxy, but remain where they were transmitted. Aliens would accidentally receive less than a second, because their planet would not stay on the spot too, and the received signal would only be a short noise and they could no longer determine where the radio wave came from. In the next chapters more to this topic.

The medium-space, that is the force field-like medium, could be very tough, with a given shape and it can only be a little stretched or compressed and although it is rigid, it is elastic to a certain degree, which is necessary to transmit explosion shocks. But at some point it becomes plastic and it tears off. After the deforming force stops, the deformation returns to its original shape and the hole in the medium-space disappears, and the space grids connect again at the same place, we can assume it like this. The planets and stars seem to be under pressure from all sides, but materia can float in all directions without resistance. But I feel how a planet causes tensions in the medium-space over great distances. The tensions are opposite to gravity and are hardly perceptible, but over longer distances two planets on a collision course can distract each other. According to my understanding, the medium-space can also move materia somehow, whether by tensions in the medium-space like already described or however a combination of magnetic field or something else might also cause tensions. The sun worries me, because according to my explanation of gravity the Earth no longer orbits around the sun because of the gravitation of the sun and also has an elliptical orbit, there must be something else here, and by an analogy with the galaxies I have come to the conclusion that the planets around the sun have an orbit to fly. More precisely, the Earth will not fall or move away from the Sun at any time, the declared principle of slow time, the principle of gravity that is not caused by materia and the disc-shaped galaxies with the spiral arms, now allow new knowledge that the planets must orbit stars, and the orbits are given. They orbit like electrons in atoms. The excuse with the big comparison is not true; there are unimaginably bigger stars in the universe. Big is relative.

I have tried to find materials that would reproduce the properties of medium-space in the outer space as I imagine it to be. A characteristic would be like Styrofoam. The space grinds are rigid and absolutely straight, but it cannot be that the gigantic universe remains with perfectly straight space grinds; therefore it is conceivable that at regular intervals the space grinds break off, as if the space would consist of several smaller cubes. Within a cube the space grids are absolutely straight, between the cubes there is a kink in the space grid, similar in an pulled out tape measure. The space grids remain connected, the medium-space, although rigid, remains elastic in the kink with small stretches. The buckling point probably moves continuously in all directions, depending on the stresses that occur in the medium-space. The space cubes could remain in the same places, but the size and shape of the cubes could change constantly. There is something against the idea that the space cubes travel through space, namely that according to my imagination, the formed kinks in the space grids will exist forever. The cubes, as I imagine them, move slightly restlessly in all possible directions, say about one degree, but materia does not notice it, how the medium-space is not influenced by the movement of the materia. Perhaps the light coming from the neighbouring space cube could be slightly deflected by the movements. A star observed at distance e.g. could swing or tremble according to my imagination. I wonder if this was ever observed. Now I remember, if the universe would be a sphere, then all space grids could run through the middle, also I wonder, if the universe could really be divided into smaller space cubes or rather wedge-shaped, but this makes the simulation more difficult, and there can be different shapes. I'll explain this later, because the sections of outer space with the nebula can't be fragmented.

Tensions in the medium space can also occur when for example a galaxy approaches. Two stars or planets, which occupy larger volumes in space and thus bend the space grids outwards, cause stresses in the space force field. If two stars accidentally collide with each other, the two stars would avoid each other due to the slight tensions in the grids, which can be felt over long distances. The deviation is sufficient so that the two stars do not reach each other in their gravitational field. The even distribution of the materia in the universe confirms the necessity of such a mechanism.

Earth and Gravity

According to my imagination, the medium-space in outer space is pure, clean. The medium-space cannot be mixed with other elements like air, water, stones and cannot penetrate them. An example for a better understanding; filling a container with water is more precise, the element water displaces the medium space from the container. With this I only want to make clear that space and water for example can only exist next to each other and not in each other.

Sometime I had all these ideas together and the next thing I said to myself was: »This is correct, the storms would loosen up or dilute the compressed medium-space because the storm wind like a helicopter rotor whirls up air and humidity, and the air and humidity will also whirl up and loosen up the compressed medium-space.« Ideally for my explanation, gravity would decrease slightly during a storm. So even air and humidity cannot penetrate the medium-space properly, and the wind mixes the layers with the differently compressed medium-space during storms. Slight temporary gravitational fluctuations during the storm have already been measured on Earth. Then in March 2018 when the probe Juno hovered over Jupiter clouds also registered gravitational fluctuations, and that at this altitude, then these differences had to be much greater at the surface. There are incredible storms there, but they also swirl up sand, loosening up the medium space and mixing the compressed layers. There is a brown spot on Jupiter indicating that there is a hurricane there that has no equal. Gravity had to decrease significantly there, but not in the middle, but at the edge of the storm. The explanation I also read there, gravity is not symmetric can not be correct. The atmosphere around Jupiter is absolutely round, but according to the common explanation of gravity, the atmosphere form is exclusively based on gravity, however it's mentioned immediately; gravity is not symmetric. Why then are the consequences not visible? Regardless of how geologically the surface looks like, regardless of the mentioned storm gravitational fluctuations, the Jupiter atmosphere remains perfectly round. Why the atmosphere around Jupiter remains unchanged I have already explained, here my gravity explanation adapted to Jupiter: Jupiter claims space volume. The space occupied is displaced to the side and compresses around Jupiter. The compression decreases from the Jupiter surface until somewhere above the atmosphere it relaxes almost completely. The medium-space also penetrates the Jupiter surface a bit and at some point cannot penetrate further because of the rigid force field structure and connections, also the imaginary space grids can no longer bend further at some point. So the compressed medium space begins somewhere in the Jupiter crust and the perceptible gravity ends somewhere above the atmosphere. The atmosphere form is determined solely by the medium-space. The rigid force field structure swallows mountains or ditches, and gravity is only a consequence and not a cause, therefore the differences remain without consequences. If Jupiter were an apple and someone would bite into it, the bitten Jupiter would possibly keep the current gravitation and atmosphere shape unchanged, and that although significant mass was missing and the shape also changed drastically. It should not be reached only the lava core, because there presumably the space hole begins. The consequence, however, would be only a lower atmosphere over all of Jupiter.

The space hole is actually point P0 in the middle of the earth which is now inflated to a large sphere. These are by the way black holes, and there are also black holes without materia in the universe, but more about that later.

I think when a space hole appears in a planet, matter becomes somehow unstable there. I can't say if there's pressure, vacuum or what's happening in the black hole. I already said, I know the matter pressure, but the explanation doesn't work with stars, they glow even without pressure, but it is unlikely that there are only exploding elements on the sun. There was a lump of cold materia, it then became big enough for gravity, with gravity the lump collected even more materia, and the lava core was caused. The reason why the lava core became bigger and ignited could be various. It could also be a mixture of elements that the medium-space did not penetrate too deeply, but the elements were not like an atomic bomb. Keyword: Galaxy with spiral arms. Why did stars originate only in spiral arms of galaxy? More about that later.

Black Holes and Stars

What are the black holes?

The Galactic Center always shines like a giant star, these are possibly a bunch of stars, and they rotate with the black hole.  The black hole holds together even the most distant matter in the galaxy and that at an incredible distance, but the black hole cannot swallow the stars that are in the immediate vicinity, but even the light should not be able to escape. Why?

Why has the materia around the black hole become a star? The black hole should swallow the materia and not make it glow, but the black hole does exactly that: it pushes the materia away and lets it melt. Why? The stars around the black hole stay together despite the repulsion because the stars are too close together and the stars stay together due to their own gravity as if they were chained together.

In the galaxy disk, materia is evenly distributed, but only in the spiral arms have stars gathered, or more precisely: only there have stars formed. Why? 

Why does the galaxy rotate? The materia moves in the galaxy, they all probably have only one energy source. What power source?

Is it possible for matter to travel at the speed of superlight? Probably yes. Can a spaceship be built that can fly at the speed of superlight? No, that wouldn't be necessary either. The attentive reader can now imagine an intergalactic journey, and the spaceship would look like a disc-shaped UFO. Possibly the disc-shaped UFO sightings are real, but everything indicates that humans will never leave Earth and we will never officially have contact with another civilization. This certainty makes me really sad...

That's my explanation:

The article was clicked on unexpectedly often in English, but the article is much too long to be called an article, and I was told that the navigation is not self-explanatory... Therefore I am writing a short book on this topic. The book will hopefully be finished in March 2020 and then it will be available for free download.


Nobody knows exactly what the Universe is, so I'll declare again everything that I wrote here as science fiction. But if any of this is correct, great!

Add comment

Security code